I’d like to think that this will stimulate an intelligent debate. Somehow I doubt it. As ever, it is children who suffer from the selfishness of their parents.
The Guardian / Jehovah's Witness mother dies after refusing blood transfusion
Religious freedom vs. child welfare
Monday, 5 November 2007 by Simon Aughton
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
- Alcatraz (1)
- apple (3)
- b-side (1)
- beer (1)
- belgium (8)
- blair (1)
- brussels (10)
- cancer (1)
- coffee (2)
- congestion charge (1)
- daily mail (1)
- emusic (1)
- food (4)
- football (1)
- funghi (1)
- golf (2)
- graffiti (1)
- Grand Canyon (1)
- graphs charts diagrams infographics (1)
- guardian (1)
- harry beck (3)
- hibernation (1)
- illy (1)
- infographics (1)
- ipod touch (1)
- itunes (1)
- jennifer aniston (1)
- Las Vegas (1)
- leopard (1)
- london (2)
- Los Angeles (1)
- mac (2)
- macbook air (1)
- mannequin bird (1)
- mark steel (1)
- moonwalking bird (1)
- moscow (1)
- mp3 (2)
- mushrooms (1)
- music (2)
- nutrition (2)
- observer (1)
- palais stoclet (1)
- pantheon (1)
- paris (1)
- parking 58 (1)
- possum (1)
- QI (1)
- religion (1)
- restaurant (1)
- ritzenhoff (1)
- San Francisco (1)
- sleep (1)
- snow (1)
- street signs (1)
- subway (1)
- sunrise (1)
- toadstools (1)
- tube/underground map (3)
- undergound (1)
- world record (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(58)
-
▼
November
(18)
- What is a sport?
- Could teenage sex strip the memory of Diana of all...
- Paris Panthéon’s clock restored
- The Web Trends Map
- “Tube map”
- Make your own ID
- Belgium on the balcony
- Croats herald Opera singer’s large appendage
- It's time the dancing monkeys of journalism found ...
- Blessay or blissertation
- David Cameron, plumber
- “Astonishing iPhone”
- Stupidity tax
- DRM train wreck day
- People who complain about the price of the iPhone...
- Google's Android
- Dig Yourself Deep
- Religious freedom vs. child welfare
-
▼
November
(18)
1 comments:
This WatchTower Society requirement that Jehovah's Witnesses must refuse to accept any blood transfusions dates back only to 1945. Misinterpreting the Old Testament prohibition against eating animal blood as a routine food item, the WatchTower Society began teaching in 1945 that receiving a blood transfusion was "eating human blood". Jehovah's Witnesses believe that receiving an infusion of human blood into their body's circulatory system is scientifically the exact same thing as eating or ingesting blood into their body's digestive system.
"A patient in the hospital maybe fed through the mouth, through the nose, or through the veins. When sugar solutions are given intravenously it is called intravenous feeding. So the hospital's own terminology recognizes as feeding the process of putting nutrition into one's system via the veins. Hence the attendant administering the transfusion is feeding the patient through the veins, and the patient receiving it is eating through his veins." -- The WATCHTOWER magazine, July 1, 1951.
Jehovah's Witnesses refuse to acknowledge that when human blood is transfused into their body's circulatory system that the transfused human blood remains to be human blood and continues to function as human blood. Jehovah's Witnesses refuse to acknowledge that if blood is eaten, then the ingested blood enters the body's digestive system, where the blood would be treated by the body exactly the same as it would treat a hotdog, a potato chip, or any other food item. Ingested blood would be completely digested and broken down into proteins, carbohydrates, fats, and waste; which are then either assimilated or excreted by the body.
The WatchTower Society uses scriptures which speak about the blood of slaughtered animals to teach Jehovah's Witnesses that blood is "sacred" because blood is the "symbol of life". Then, the WatchTower Society turns around and requires Jehovah's Witnesses to sacrifice their own "life" to maintain the alleged "sacredness" of a "symbol" of the very thing they are sacrificing -- their life. Jehovah's Witnesses refuse to acknowledge that the WatchTower doctrine on blood moronically places a higher value on the SYMBOL than it does on the THING SYMBOLIZED.
In fact, the Old Testament scriptures permitted the eating of unbled animal meat, which the Bible treats exactly the same as eating animal blood itself. In isolated occasions, when humans needed to eat unbled meat in order to sustain their own human life, the Mosaic Law permitted such, but then required the eaters to fulfill the requirements of being "unclean" for a few days. Thus, the Bible recognized that the sustaining of human life was more "sacred" than maintaining the sacredness of animal blood. To do otherwise would be doing exactly what the moronic WatchTower Society does. It would make the SYMBOL more SACRED than the THING SYMBOLIZED.
In fact, the WatchTower Society is leading Jehovah's Witnesses to disobey GOD and violate the Holy Scriptures in one of the most serious ways possible. Because humans were created in GOD's image, GOD considers human life sacred. A Jehovah's Witness who sacrifices their SACRED LIFE in order to maintain the sacredness of a SYMBOL of that SACRED LIFE varies little from those who profane life by committing suicide. Those Jehovah's Witness Elders who teach and police this moronic doctrine vary little from common accessories to murder. The Bible is fairly clear in how GOD views murder, and how He deals with Murderers.
This moronic twisting of scripture would be laughable if not for the fact that it has lead to the pointless deaths of numerous Jehovah's Witnesses in the past, and it will continue to lead to the pointless deaths of many more Jehovah's Witnesses in the future.
SUMMARIES OF 300 JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES LAWSUITS & COURT CASES
The following website summarizes over 315 U.S. court cases and lawsuits affecting children of Jehovah's Witness Parents, including 200+ cases where the JW Parents refused to consent to life-saving blood transfusions for their dying children:
DIVORCE, BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS, AND OTHER LEGAL ISSUES AFFECTING CHILDREN OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
http://jwdivorces.bravehost.com
Post a Comment